The amount of active
participation in the learning process is an excellent index of
the quality of instruction for the purpose of predicting or accounting
for individual learning.
– Benjamin Bloom
We believe that when students are actively engaged in their learning,
performance is improved. Active engagement, as we propose to use
the term, connotes students continually processing and internalizing
information and then making appropriate application. The teacher's
role in promoting active engagement is not only to engineer the environment
to maximize learning opportunities for students, but also to mediate-that
is, to respond to students in ways that will help them give meaning
to those opportunities and to develop thought processes which will
allow them to learn independently. When learning is passive, the
learner comes to the encounter without curiosity, without questions,
and without interest in the outcome. When learning is active, the
learner is seeking something. She wants an answer to a question,
needs information to solve a problem, or is searching for a way to
do a job.
In a study done by Csikszentmihalyi
et al. (1993), researchers equipped high school students with
beepers and told them they would be beeped randomly throughout
the school day. When they heard the beep, the students were asked
to stop and write down whatever was going on in their minds at
the time. The researchers beeped 28 students who were listening
to a Chinese history lesson about Genghis Khan's invasion of
China in the 12th century. Only two students were thinking about
China: one was thinking about what he'd had at a Chinese restaurant
two weeks before and the other was wondering why Chinese men
in the 12th century wore their hair in ponytails! Essentially,
no one was thinking about the lesson or using their natural genius
to engage with its content.
In another interesting study Meyers
and Jones (1997) reported several disturbing discoveries: that
while teachers are lecturing, students were not attending to
what was being said 40 percent of the time; in the first ten
minutes of lecture, students retain 70 percent of the information,
in the last 10 minutes, 20 percent; students lose their initial
interest, and attention levels continue to drop, as a lecture
proceeds; and four months after taking an introductory psychology
course, students knew only 8 percent more than a control group
who had never taken the course. The problem is not that teachers
talk; it's that they talk too much. A time comes when everyone
needs to speak in order to clarify what she has heard, read,
observed, or experienced. The fact is, we often do not know what
we think until we try to say it. The social transmission of knowledge,
which takes place when students interact with each other and
test their ideas against those of their peers, is one of the
most powerful forces in expanding students thinking. |